Random Notes From What I’m Reading

The story of my life is the story of my faith…

Fighting With Swords

with 2 comments

By Brandon Andress for Relevant Magazine

How can Jesus, in one breath, say that a characteristic of his discipleship is that of peacemaker (Matthew 5:9), but then in another breath say that, “[he] did not come to bring peace, but a sword”?

This seeming contradiction has caused great confusion. This scripture has been used and abused by Christian religious zealots and fanatics as evidence that Jesus condones violence. I’ve often wondered if it’s possible that this line has been misunderstood and taken out of context when measured against the language of the old testament prophets in their understanding that God is working for shalom (oneness and wholeness).

Jesus had every opportunity to wield the sword, but never did. It’s odd. Why did Jesus tell his followers to “never resist an evil person,” and further, to “love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you”? Who would he use the sword on? Who would his disciples use the sword on? The answer is no one, except Peter, once.

After Judas kissed Jesus in the garden of Gethsemane the guards stepped forward to arrest Jesus and Peter cut the guard’s ear off by sword. Jesus said, “put your sword back in its place.” and, “do you not think that I cannot call on my Father, and he will at once put at my disposal more than twelve legions of angels?” Jesus made a military statement to describe how he could respond then says, “but how then would the Scriptures be fulfilled that say it must not happen this way?” The way of Jesus was not the way of the sword it was the way of the towel (of self-sacrificial love). Always loving, always pouring himself out, always giving self-sacrificially and without responding the way the Kingdom of the world responds.

Early in Jesus’ ministry he had the opportunity to use the power of the sword. Jesus said that he was going to do it God’s way. Not by force, not by violence, but by the cross. The one act that stops the vicious cycle of violence and is validated by the resurrection (not death and violence winning, but by life through sacrificial love). Love always wins and triumphs over evil, but not with the sword. And the way of the sword was not the way of Jesus.

If a sword is what Jesus came to bring but we do not have any evidence that Jesus ever used a sword violently, then it is possible that it may be symbolic. Scripture describes God having a double-edged sword for a tongue (Revelation 1:17), his words being even sharper than a double edged sword (Hebrews 4:12), and his words being the sword of the Spirit (Ephesians 6:17). If we are consistent, you get this idea that a sword, symbolically, refers to truth, the word of God.

Jesus came to bring truth. The word of God is sharp, it divides, even to the point of dividing people who are close to each other. Why? Because the truth is not accepted or pursued by everyone and many stand against the truth. By Jesus just “being” he created conflict because he is truth. The paradox as we know is that the truth of God brings peace (shalom) to those who seek reconciliation through Christ. Peace is founded on the truth of God revealed in Christ. Jesus did not come to bring peace, came to bring the truth of God and through that comes peace.


Written by Ryan

December 1, 2007 at 2:13 pm

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. tree worshipper…


    December 1, 2007 at 5:45 pm

  2. tree worshipper? I don’t get it…


    December 2, 2007 at 6:47 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: